- Pay For Essay
- Write My Essay
- Homework Writing Help
- Essay Editing Service
- Thesis Writing Help
- Write My College Essay
- Do My Essay
- Term Paper Writing Service
- Coursework Writing Service
- Write My Research Paper
- Assignment Writing Help
- Essay Writing Help
- Call Now! (USA) Login Order now
- EssayBasics.com Call Now! (USA) Order now
- Writing Guides
Teacher And Student Relationship (Essay Sample)
Teacher and student relationship.
Teachers hold the highest regard for students; ideally, students are encouraged to respect their teachers and emulate them. Teachers play important roles in molding student’s personality and the type of relationship teacher develop with students will determine the student’s academic and personal growth in the future. Developing a positive teacher-student relationship means creating an encouraging learning environment where students are free to interact with both teachers and their peers. Effective communication alone does not offer effective building blocks to a strong teacher-student relationship; the learning environment plays a key role nurturing student’s abilities.
One of the most challenging aspects of nurturing a good teacher-student relationship is the different personality traits of students. Some students are hardworking but are introverts, while other students are naturally aggressive, hence distracting others affecting the learning environment. Students have varied abilities; other students might not fit in a highly competitive learning environment. Teachers need to address such challenges by not only being extremely patient. Teachers need to be lenient at the same time be strict, any excess of any of the two might hinder students from learning effectively.
The effective teacher-student relationship evolves and needs time, teacher act as mothers for students during their early years in school. They guide them and encourage them to be positive about life. As students progress to secondary level, teachers focus more on academic achievement forgetting about the life values. Concentrating on academic achievements alone and not instilling moral values might affect student personality. There is the need for teachers to make adjusted in their teaching approaches to accommodate student varied need. Students come from mixed cultural and social backgrounds; therefore, teachers need incorporate the different values to make students feel part of the learning process.
Giving individualized student attention means allocating appropriate time to address different needs of students. Having a better understanding of students means understanding their values, their weak areas, and challenges and addressing them individually. Being able to develop a level of understanding with every student, they will feel valued, and this would boost their self-esteem. All these positive behavior will be reflected in their grades and their general behavior.
Teachers need to make students feel accepted by being warm and nurturing, and teachers need to be aware of student’s thoughts and feelings and make them feel important. All these require being present within them throughout the day. The size of the class and the number of students in a class is vital in enhancing good student’s teacher relationship. A larger class would mean spending more time with many students that can be difficult .Teachers need to provide individualized attention to each student; therefore, a small class would be a better environment for both teachers and students.
Building a positive relationship with students makes students positive about school in general. Students become free to make mistakes and seek help whenever necessary. It is not surprising that research studies reveal that constructive teacher student relationship has positively affected student academic performance. The natures of relationship teachers have with their students have largely affected student’s socioeconomic status and their professional development. Teacher’s relationship with students matters more. Any teacher who wants to make a real and lasting difference among his students need to put more effort in building high-performance students through effective interaction and creating a conducive learning environment for all his students.
Teacher-Student Relationships Matter
- Posted March 17, 2021
- By Gianna Cacciatore
- Counseling and Mental Health
- Disruption and Crises
- Teachers and Teaching
Effective teachers form authentic, caring relationships with their students. In the best of times, forming these relationships can be a challenge; in a post-pandemic world, where many teachers are engaging with students remotely, building relationships can feel impossible. Fortunately, says trained counselor and educator Megan Marcus , educators can learn the skills necessary to build strong relationships, both in person and online.
Marcus is the founder of FuelEd , a Houston-based nonprofit committed to teaching these skills to educators around the country. By providing teachers with access to one-on-one counseling, group workshops, and educator training, FuelEd hopes to close what it perceives to be a gap in educator preparation: the space between what an educator is expected to do — build strong, secure relationships with students, families, and coworkers — and the level of social and emotional support educators actually receive. Inspired by Marcus’ background in human psychology, Fuel Ed leads with the belief that teachers cannot effectively care for their students unless they care for themselves first.
“Just one relationship with a caregiver throughout a lifespan can actually change the brain’s development, heal trauma, and promote learning. Educators have the potential to utilize this power. Many do organically, through naturally forming secure relationships. But we could do so much more if educators were equipped with the skills and self-awareness to systematically do this work,” explains Marcus.
Here, Marcus offers four steps educators can take to promote emotional intelligence and build relationship-driven schools, both in-person and online.
1. Learn the science behind strong relationships.
Research shows that the way a person relates to caregivers early in life can impact that person’s relationships later on. For example, explains Marcus, “if you had insecure relationships in your childhood, you’re more likely to build relationships with others that aren’t secure.” The good news? Once identified, a person’s relationship patterns can change. That means educators can learn the skills behind secure relationship-building — and they can teach them. This gives educators the opportunity to, within their daily interactions, strengthen the ways their students relate to others throughout life.
2. Embrace the power of empathic listening.
Empathic listening means listening to what a student has to say — a student’s “strong emotions and painful experiences,” says Marcus — and not responding. No reassuring, no offering advice. Just listening. While deceptively simple, this type of listening can help a student build self-regulation skills. That’s because it kicks off a powerful interpersonal cycle. “Someone comes to you, they share their feelings, and instead of jumping in to problem solve, you listen. That’s very trust-building. Now, not only is this person calmer and better able to solve their own problems, but they want to come back to you again, share more. And the more you can learn about them and their needs, the more you, as the administrator and the teacher, can be respond to their needs,” explains Marcus.
“Just one relationship with a caregiver throughout a lifespan can actually change the brain’s development, heal trauma, and promote learning. ... We could do so much more if educators were equipped with the skills and self-awareness to systematically do this work.”
Empathic listening, she adds, can also help school leaders build stronger, more positive relationships with staff.
To make space for empathic listening, educators can prioritize opportunities for one-on-one connections in scheduled check-ins or drop-in office hours. Since this type of listening can take place in person, on Zoom, or over the phone, this is a skill that all educators, no matter their learning modality, can use to form more secure relationships.
3. Practice genuine vulnerability.
Often, educators feel restrained by the need to exert authority in a space, so they refrain from sharing their genuine frustrations or emotions. This hinders the development of secure attachments, says Marcus, and limits the social-emotional culture of a school. Instead, she suggests, educators should share their experiences directly. Once one person shows vulnerability, another person will open up. Only then can secure relationships blossom.
This practice fuels student-teacher relationships, but it is also key to creating an over-arching culture of safety in a school. “The more that principals can model empathy and self-awareness, the more they can share their journey with teachers and be vulnerable, the more it’s going to encourage educators to engage in the work,” says Marcus.
If you are educating in person, you can practice sharing personal details in informal exchanges with both students and colleagues. If you are educating online, Marcus says, you can use virtual opportunities, like introductory videos, pet cameos, or Zoom dance parties, to introduce your personality to your school community.
4. Provide educators with opportunities to do their own healing.
Teaching is, at its core, interpersonal work. It requires high levels of emotional intelligence. When educators approach the work unprepared for its social-emotional load, says Marcus, relationships suffer. Her advice? Give educators access to spaces and resources where they can do their own introspection and healing. When teachers are invited to engage in the therapeutic process of unpacking their personal stories and triggers, it can lead to social-emotional growth. The more that educators are able to improve their own social-emotional intelligence, the more students will be able to learn and feel safe.
- FuelEd's professional development workshops for educators.
- From Making Caring Common: How to Build Empathy and Strengthen your School Community
- Teaching Social and Emotional Skills All Day
- Safeguarding the Mental Health of Teachers
- Trauma Informed video series
Connecting education research to practice — with timely insights for educators, families, and communities
Fostering Whole-School Wellness in a Pandemic
Fighting the "Hidden Pandemic"
A Space for Joy
Educators talk about the impact COVID has had on school happiness
Why Teacher-Student Relationships Matter
- Share article
Students spend more than 1,000 hours with their teacher in a typical school year. That’s enough time to build a relationship that could ignite a student’s lifetime love of learning—and it’s enough time for the dynamic to go totally off the rails.
Education watchers have long known that the relationship with a teacher can be critically important to how well students learn. But emerging research is giving a clearer picture than ever of how teachers can build and leverage strong relationships with their students.
“People sometimes mistake a kind of casual familiarity and friendliness for the promotion of really deep relationships that are about a child’s potential, their interests, their strengths, and weaknesses,” said Mary Helen Immordino-Yang, a cognitive neuroscientist at the University of Southern California who studies the effects of emotions and mindsets on learning.
“A lot of teachers ... have really strong abilities to engage socially with the students, but then it’s not enough,” she said. “You have to go much deeper than that and actually start to engage with students around their curiosity, their interests, their habits of mind through understanding and approaching material to really be an effective teacher.”
In a forthcoming longitudinal study with Bank Street College of Education, Immordino-Yang is tracking how the highly effective teachers of low-income students set classroom norms and feelings of trust and safety for students—but also leverage that foundation to promote students’ deeper thinking and engagement.
Why are teacher-student relationships important?
“The relational part of teaching may very well be its most underrated aspect. ... When teachers are good at building relationships with students, the skill is seen more as cover for a lack of content knowledge or wherewithal to instruct with rigor,” James Ford, the 2015 North Carolina State Teacher of the Year and the program director for the Public School Forum of North Carolina, told Education Week . To the contrary, he added, “Our first job as teachers is to make sure that we learn our students, that we connect with them on a real level, showing respect for their culture and affirming their worthiness to receive the best education possible.”
A Review of Educational Research analysis of 46 studies found that strong teacher-student relationships were associated in both the short- and long-term with improvements on practically every measure schools care about: higher student academic engagement, attendance, grades, fewer disruptive behaviors and suspensions, and lower school dropout rates. Those effects were strong even after controlling for differences in students’ individual, family, and school backgrounds.
Teachers benefit, too. A study in the European Journal of Psychology of Education found that a teacher’s relationship with students was the best predictor of how much the teacher experienced joy versus anxiety in class.
How does a teacher’s approach affect that relationship?
In a 2018 study, Arizona State University researcher Victoria Theisen-Homer found different teacher-training programs prioritized different kinds of relationships with students:
- An instrumental focus involved a limited, one-way relationship in which teachers cull bits of information about students specifically to motivate them to behave well and focus on teacher-directed tasks. The relationships “were structured as a controlled means to a particular end: student compliance,” she found. “Students learned that their value was tied to the degree to which they worked hard and behaved in line with what mostly white authority figures demanded.”
- A reciprocal focus required teachers to gather complex information and develop a holistic understanding of their students, inviting the students to grapple with content and problems together. “These students not only learned to think for themselves, but also had adults who affirmed and responded to their thoughts and experiences. Such interactions prepared them to engage with authority figures, and to someday hold positions of authority themselves,” Theisen-Homer said.
The study also found in an analysis of two of these programs that teachers trained in the instrumental focus were more likely to go on to teach in low-income, high-minority schools, while those trained in reciprocal relationships ended up in schools with more high-income and white students. It was not clear why teachers ended up sorting in this way, but it raised concerns about differences in the kinds of relationships high- and low-income students might experience with teachers.
“Sometimes teachers don’t understand the importance that their relationship with each student has on that student’s identity and sense of belonging,” said Vicki Nishioka, a senior researcher with Education Northwest who studies teacher-student relationships. “What gets in the way of that is a more authoritarian kind of discipline and interaction approach with students, which really doesn’t work.”
For example, a 2016 study randomly assigned teachers to increase their positive interactions with students. Students of teachers who boosted their ratio to five positive comments and interactions for every negative one had significantly less disruptive behavior and more time on task academically than the students of a control group of teachers.
How can teachers improve their relationships with students?
In a word: Empathy. Across several recent studies, researchers have found that teachers who cultivate empathy for and with their students are able to manage students’ behavior and academic engagement better.
Nishioka finds that trying to suppress biases or stereotypes about students can sometimes make them worse, but practicing perspective-taking—actively imagining how a student might perceive or be affected by a situation—can reduce bias and deepen teacher-student relationships. She recommended teachers:
- Talk to students to understand differences in their perceptions and expectations in class.
- Research cultural differences between teachers and students to head off cultural misunderstandings, particularly around norms, styles, and language.
- Teach and model perspective-taking for students in class.
How can teachers maintain healthy boundaries with students?
Experts caution that for teachers and students, “relationship” does not equal “friend,” particularly on social media. Many districts have rules against teachers following or friending current students on Facebook, Twitter, or other platforms, in part because it might open teachers to liability if they see inappropriate behavior from students online.
Teachers also should be upfront with students who confide in them that they are required by law to report evidence of abuse and can’t keep secrets that could put students in danger.
Teacher and education author Starr Sackstein, whose blog is hosted on the edweek.org website, also recommends that while teachers can and should share personal stories if they are “purposeful and appropriate” to the discussion, they should use these to model for students what level of detail is appropriate for sharing in social conversations.
How can relationships with students support teacher quality?
While student feedback is often incorporated into teacher evaluations in higher education, it is rarely a direct part of K-12 teacher evaluations. But that doesn’t mean districts can’t use student feedback to improve teaching practice, and in particular, such feedback can be used to help teachers build deeper relationships with students.
For example, the High Tech High Media Arts charter school in San Diego trains students using a six-week course to act as observers. The students met regularly with the teacher to give feedback about their communication skills and engagement in the classroom, and to brainstorm better ways to reach out to students. Teachers and administrators found that going through the training gave students better understanding of the teachers’ roles. School staff members said that teachers also “developed deeper relationships with students, interacted with students in a more positive way during class, communicated information about projects and assignments to students more clearly, generated better questions to stimulate student dialogue during Socratic seminars, and created more collaborative learning environments for students.”
A version of this article appeared in the March 13, 2019 edition of Education Week as Why Teacher-Student Relationships Matter
Sign Up for EdWeek Update
Edweek top school jobs.
Sign Up & Sign In
Positive Teacher-Student Relationships
What are they.
Everyone can point to a teacher who made a difference in his or her life, and also to one who made life miserable for a short time. Why? Because the teacher-student relationship is at the heart of teaching. As Rita Pierson noted in her famous TED talk, “Kids aren’t going to learn from someone they don’t like.”
But what is a positive teacher-student relationship? Here are some examples based on research that asks both teachers and students what makes this relationship so special:
For Teachers: According to educators, a positive relationship with a student is close and supportive, but not overly dependent. A teacher who cares about his or her students believes that every child can learn, but differently and at different rates, sets high expectations, is warm and trusting, and strives to keep the relationship conflict-free. He or she also uses humor and admits mistakes, sets clear boundaries, and is open, honest, and approachable.
For Students: Students told researchers that good teachers listen to and take a personal interest in students’ lives. They show respect, value the individuality of each student, and are kind and polite. A caring teacher gives honest, but kind feedback, and offers second chances. They help students with schoolwork, manage the classroom well, and, perhaps most importantly, they plan fun activities.
For Higher Education: At the college level, students prefer professors who are approachable—they say “hi” on campus, smile often, and stay after class to talk to students. They also set high expectations, are fair, honest, trustworthy, respectful, open, supportive, and encouraging.
Why Cultivate Them?
Decades of research clearly show that positive teacher-student relationships are extremely important for student outcomes in all categories—feelings, attitudes, behavior, and achievement—and at all ages.
Students do better overall with caring teachers.
- Studies have found that for students from pre-K to 12, positive student-teacher relationships increase engagement , motivation , prosocial —kind and helpful—behavior, and academic achievement .
Seeing students as individuals is key to their well-being and success.
- When teachers use practices that are sensitive to students’ individual differences and needs and that also include student voice, their students tend to be more motivated and show higher academic achievement ; they also feel better about school, participate more, and show less disruptive behavior across grade levels.
Negative student-teacher relationships can have long-lasting impact.
- Conflict-ridden relationships with teachers in kindergarten predict worse grades, work habits, and discipline problems into late elementary or even middle school.
Relationships matter at every age.
- In preschool and kindergarten : When their relationships with teachers are more emotionally supportive and less conflictual, preschool students become more socially and academically competent; similar effects occur for kindergarteners.
- In elementary and middle school , close, positive student-teacher relationships are associated with greater student engagement in learning and better social and behavioral outcomes in general, including less risky behavior .
- In high school , students who connect with their teachers are less likely to engage in risky behavior , including substance abuse, sexual activity, and suicide.
- In university , students are less likely to drop out , and they show more commitment, engagement, effort, intellectual development, and academic achievement.
Teachers, too, benefit from good relationships with their students.
- They experience the joy of teaching, helping to maintain their commitment to the profession by preventing burnout .
2 x 10: Getting to Know A Student
A Moment for Me: A Self-Compassion Break for Teens
Check for Understanding Circle
Common Beliefs Survey: Teaching Racially and Ethnically Diverse Students
Designing the Classroom to Promote Kindness
Dialogue Journals for Elementary Students
Dialogue Journals for High School Students
Dialogue Journals for Middle School Students
Dimensions of Difference and Similarity Reflection
Giving Wise Feedback
Honesty Commitment for Students
I See You. Everyone Matters.
Imagining Flourishing and Kindness: A Mindfulness Practice for Adults
Kindness Art for Students
Listening with Compassion
Look Up Vibe (LUV Moment)
Looking for Gratitude in School
Loving-Kindness for Adults
Loving-Kindness for Someone You Care About
Mindful Reflection Process for Developing Culturally Responsive Practices
Mindfully Creating Positive Relationships with Students
Modeling SEL for Students
Music to Inspire Kindness
Overcoming Obstacles to an Open Heart
Pleasant Events Calendar for Students
Quotes and Sayings: A Contemplative Practice
Reading Ourselves Whole: A Contemplative Choral Reading Method
Reflecting on SEL Skills
Say “We” to Nurture Collaboration in Students
Standing Up Against Discrimination
Supporting SEL at Grade-Level or Content Area Team Meetings
Sustaining an Open Heart
Thank You for Believing in Me
The SEL 3 Signature Practices
Understanding Prejudice Through Paper Plate Portraits
Where We Stand
GGIE Online Courses for Educators
Do you want to dive deeper into the science behind our GGIE practices? Enroll in one of our online courses for educators!
Handbook of Research on Student Engagement pp 431–449 Cite as
Teacher–Student Relationships, Engagement in School, and Student Outcomes
- Tara L. Hofkens 3 &
- Robert C. Pianta 3
- First Online: 20 October 2022
Classrooms are complex relational settings, and student engagement in these settings reflects relationally mediated participation in opportunities that are structured through interactions with teachers. Specifically, we posit that relationships with teachers either produce or inhibit student engagement to the extent that interactions meaningfully challenge students in a context of consistent and effective relational and instructional supports. In this chapter, we describe the Teaching Through Interactions (TTI) framework for understanding, studying, and ultimately improving engagement. Importantly, our work reflects the view that engagement is not a characteristic of a student; rather, engagement emerges in the context of interactions with their teacher, which are fundamental to the classroom setting as a developmental context for children and adolescence. Engagement, in this view, is both a mediator of impacts and an outcome in its own right that our work shows can be improved by leveraging the capacity of relationships and interactions to nurture the quality and durability of students’ involvement in classroom learning. We conclude with suggestions for future research and education policy.
- Teacher–student relationships
- Teacher–student interactions
- Student engagement
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution .
- Available as PDF
- Read on any device
- Instant download
- Own it forever
- Available as EPUB and PDF
- Compact, lightweight edition
- Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
- Free shipping worldwide - see info
- Durable hardcover edition
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Please see the Teachstone website for more information about the CLASS measures and coaching ( https://teachstone.com/ ). Note that co-author Pianta has a financial interest in Teachstone as the distributor of CLASS-related observation and professional development materials.
Achieve, Inc. (2006). Closing the expectations gap: An annual 50-state progress report on the alignment of high school policies with the demands of college and work . Achieve. https://www.achieve.org/publications/closing-expectations-gap-2014.
Ainsworth, M. D., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, D. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation . Erlbaum.
Allen, J. P., Philliber, S., Herrling, S., & Kuperminc, G. P. (1997). Preventing teen pregnancy and academic failure: Experimental evaluation of a developmentally based approach. Child Development , 729–742. https://doi.org/10.2307/1132122
Allen, J. P., Pianta, R. C., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., & Lun, J. (2011). An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement. Science, 333 (6045), 1034–1037. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207998
CrossRef PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Anderson, A. R., Christenson, S. L., Sinclair, M. F., & Lehr, C. A. (2004). Check & connect: The importance of relationships for promoting engagement with school. Journal of School Psychology, 42 (2), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2004.01.002
CrossRef Google Scholar
Arnold, D. H., McWilliams, L., & Arnold, E. H. (1998). Teacher discipline and child misbehavior in day care: Untangling causality with correlational data. Developmental Psychology, 34 (2), 276. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-16184.108.40.2066
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72 (2), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709902158883
Aud, S., Hussar, W., Johnson, F., Kena, G., Roth, E., Manning, E., Wang, X., & Zhang, J. (2012). The condition of education 2012 (NCES 2012–045) . National Center for Education Statistics.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67 (3), 1206–1222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01791.x
Betoret, F. D. (2009). Self-efficacy, school resources, job stressors and burnout among Spanish primary and secondary school teachers: A structural equation approach. Educational Psychology, 29 (1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410802459234
Bohn, C. M., Roehrig, A. D., & Pressley, M. (2004). The first days of school in the classrooms of two more effective and four less effective primary-grades teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 104 (4), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1086/499753
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss (Attachment, Vol. 1) . Basic Books.
Bowman, B., & Stott, F. (1994). Understanding development in a cultural context: The challenge for teachers. In B. Mallory & R. New (Eds.), Diversity and developmentally appropriate practices: Challenges for early childhood education (pp. 19–34). Teachers College Press.
Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school . National Academy Press.
Brock, L. B., & Curby, T. W. (in press). Emotional support consistency and teacher-child relationships forecast social competence and problem behaviors in pre-kindergarten and kindergarten. Early Education and Development . 10.1080/10409289.2014.866020.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (theoretical models of human development) (Vol. 1, 5th ed., pp. 993–1029). Wiley.
Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328–375). Macmillan.
Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education . Harvard University Press.
Cameron, C. E., Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., & Jewkes, A. M. (2008). Effects of classroom organization on letter–word reading in first grade. Journal of School Psychology, 46 (2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.03.002
Carbonaro, W. J., & Gamoran, A. (2002). The production of achievement inequality in high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 39 , 801–827. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312039004801
Carver, S. M., & Klahr, D. (Eds.). (2001). Cognition and instruction: 25 years of progress . Erlbaum.
Castro, S., Granlund, M., & Almqvist, L. (2017). The relationship between classroom quality-related variables and engagement levels in Swedish preschool classrooms: A longitudinal study. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 25 (1), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2015.1102413
Clem, A. L., Rudasill, K. M., Hirvonen, R., Aunola, K., & Kiuru, N. (2020). The roles of teacher–student relationship quality and self-concept of ability in adolescents’ achievement emotions: Temperament as a moderator. European Journal of Psychology of Education , 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00473-6
Cohen, D. K., Ball, D. L., & Educational Resources Information Center (U.S.). (1999). Instruction, capacity, and improvement . Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania, Graduate School of Education. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED431749.pdf
Collins, W. A., & Repinski, D. J. (1994). Relationships during adolescence: Continuity and change in interpersonal perspective. In R. Montemayor, G. Adams, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Personal relationships during adolescence (pp. 7–36). Sage Publications.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2015). Mathematics Standards . Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/
Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self-processes in development: Minnesota symposium on child psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 43–77). Erlbaum.
Crosnoe, R., Johnson, M. K., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2004). Intergenerational bonding in school: The behavioral and contextual correlates of student-teacher relationships. Sociology of Education, 77 (1), 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070407700103
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Flow: The psychology of engagement in everyday life. The masterminds series . Basic Books.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikzentmihaly, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience (Vol. 1990) . Harper & Row.
Danielson, C. (2012). Observing classroom practice. Educational Leadership, 70 (3), 32–37.
Dawes, N. P., & Larson, R. (2011). How youth get engaged: Grounded-theory research on motivational development in organized youth programs. Developmental Psychology, 47 (1), 259. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020729
de Kruif, R. E. L., McWilliam, R. A., Ridley, S. M., & Wakely, M. B. (2000). Classification of teachers’ interaction behaviors in early childhood classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15 , 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(00)00051-X
De Wit, D. J., Karioja, K., & Rye, B. J. (2010). Student perceptions of diminished teacher and classmate support following the transition to high school: Are they related to declining attendance? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21 (4), 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2010.532010
DeCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation: The internal effective determinants of behavior . Academic Press.
Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation . Plenum Press.
Downer, J., Sabol, T. J., & Hamre, B. K. (2010). Teacher-child interactions in the classroom: Toward a theory of within- and cross-domain links to children’s developmental outcomes. Early Education and Development, 21 , 699–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2010.497453
Eccles, J. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44 (2), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520902832368
Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21 , 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00725.x
Emmer, E. T., & Stough, L. M. (2001). Classroom management: A critical part of educational psychology, with implications for teacher education. Educational Psychologist, 36 (2), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3602_5
Evertson, C., & Harris, A. (1999). Support for managing learning-centered classrooms: The classroom organization and management program. In H. J. Freiberg (Ed.), Beyond behaviorism: Changing the classroom management paradigm (pp. 59–74). Allyn & Bacon.
Farb, A. F., & Matjasko, J. L. (2012). Recent advances in research on school-based extracurricular activities and adolescent development. Developmental Review, 32 (1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2011.10.001
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–132). Springer.
Fredricks, J. A. (2014). Eight myths of student disengagement: Creating classrooms of deep learning . Corwin Press.
Fredricks, J. A., Wang, M. T., Linn, J. S., Hofkens, T. L., Sung, H., Parr, A., & Allerton, J. (2016). Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science engagement. Learning and Instruction, 43 , 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.009
Gallup. (2014). State of America’s schools: The path to winning again in education . Gallup.
Gasser, L., Grütter, J., Buholzer, A., & Wettstein, A. (2018). Emotionally supportive classroom interactions and students’ perceptions of their teachers as caring and just. Learning and Instruction, 54 , 82–92.
Gregory, A., Allen, J. P., Mikami, A. Y., Hafen, C. A., & Pianta, R. C. (2014). Effects of a professional development program on behavioral engagement of students in middle and high school. Psychology in the Schools, 51 (2), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21741
Gutman, L. M., & Sulzby, E. (2000). The role of autonomy-support versus control in the emergent writing behaviors of African American kindergarten children. Reading Research and Instruction, 39 , 170–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070009558319
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72 (2), 625–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00301
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2010). Classroom environments and developmental processes: Conceptualization and measurement. In Handbook of research on schools, schooling, and human development (pp. 25-41). Routledge.
Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Downer, J. T., & Mashburn, A. J. (2005). Teachers’ perceptions of conflict with young students: Looking beyond problem behaviors. Social Development, 17 (1), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00418.x
Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Downer, J. T., DeCoster, J., Mashburn, A. J., Jones, S. M., … Hamagami, A. (2013). Teaching through interactions: Testing a developmental framework of teacher effectiveness in over 4,000 classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 113 (4), 461–487. https://doi.org/10.1086/669616
Hamre, B., Hatfield, B., Pianta, R., & Jamil, F. (2014). Evidence for general and domain-specific elements of teacher–child interactions: Associations with preschool children’s development. Child Development, 85 (3), 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12184
Harter, S. (1996). Teacher and classmate influences on scholastic motivation, self-esteem, and level of voice in adolescents. In J. Juvonen & K. Wentzel (Eds.), Social motivation: Understanding children’s school adjustment (pp. 11–42). Cambridge University Press.
Heatly, M. C., & Votruba-Drzal, E. (2017). Parent-and teacher-child relationships and engagement at school entry: Mediating, interactive, and transactional associations across contexts. Developmental Psychology, 53 , 1042–1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000310
Hofkens, T. L., & Ruzek, E. (2019). Measuring student engagement to inform effective interventions in schools. In Handbook of student engagement interventions (pp. 309–324). Academic Press.
Hughes, J. W., Zhang, D., & Hill, C. R. (2006). Peer assessment of normative and individual teacher-student support predict social acceptance and engagement among low-achieving children. Journal of School Psychology, 43 , 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.10.002
Jimerson, S. R., Campos, E., & Greif, J. L. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8 (1), 7–27.
Juvonen, J. (2007). Reforming middle schools: Focus on continuity, social connectedness, and engagement. Educational Psychologist, 42 (4), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701621046
Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Research Paper. MET Project. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation .
Kane, T. J., Kerr, K. A., & Pianta, R. C. (Eds.). (2014). Designing teaching evaluation systems . Wiley & Sons.
Kena, G., Aud, S., Johnson, F., Wang, X., Zhang, J., Rathbun, A., & Kristapovich, P. (2014). The Condition of Education 2014. NCES 2014–083. National Center for Education Statistics . http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED545122.pdf
Klassen, R. M., Perry, N. E., & Frenzel, A. C. (2012). Teachers’ relatedness with students: An underemphasized component of teachers’ basic psychological needs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104 (1), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026253
Kobak, R., Herres, J., Gaskins, C., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2012). Teacher–student interactions and attachment states of mind as predictors of early romantic involvement and risky sexual behaviors. Attachment & Human Development, 14 (3), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2012.672282
Ladd, G. W., Birch, S. H., & Buhs, E. S. (1999). Children’s social and scholastic lives in kindergarten: Related spheres of influence? Child Development, 70 , 1373–1400. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00101
Lam, S., Wong, B. P. H., Yang, H., & Liu, Y. (2012). Understanding student engagement with a contextual model. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 403–419). Springer.
Lippard, C. N., La Paro, K. M., Rouse, H. L., & Crosby, D. A. (2018). A closer look at teacher-child relationships and classroom emotional context in preschool. Child & Youth Care Forum, 47 , 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-017-9414-1
LoCasale-Crouch, J., Jamil, F., Pianta, R. C., Rudasill, K. M., & DeCoster, J. (2018). Observed quality and consistency of fifth graders’ teacher–student interactions: Associations with feelings, engagement, and performance in school. SAGE Open, 8 (3), 2158244018794774. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018794774
Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD). (2013). LAUSD school experience survey . http://home.lausd.net/apps/news/article/299935
Magnusson, D., & Stattin, H. (1998). Person-context interaction theory. In W. Damon & R. M. Learner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (theoretical models of human development) (Vol. 1, 5th ed., pp. 685–760). Wiley.
Martin, A. J., & Dowson, M. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 79 (1), 327–365. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325583
Mashburn, A. J., Hamre, B. K., Downer, J. T., & Pianta, R. C. (2007). Teacher and classroom characteristics associated with teachers’ ratings of pre-kindergartners’ relationships and behavior. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24 , 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282906290594
Mashburn, A. J., Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., Downer, J. T., Barbarin, O., Bryant, D., Burchinal, M., Early, D., & Howes, C. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children’s development of academic, language, and social skills. Child Development, 79 , 732–749. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01154.x
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory Into Practice, 41 , 226–233.
McCormick, M. P., & O’Connor, E. E. (2015). Teacher–child relationship quality and academic achievement in elementary school: Does gender matter? Journal of Educational Psychology, 107 , 502. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037457
McFarland, L., Murray, E., & Phillipson, S. (2016). Student–teacher relationships and student self-concept: Relations with teacher and student gender. Australian Journal of Education, 60 (1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944115626426
Mikami, A. Y., Ruzek, E. A., Hafen, C. A., Gregory, A., & Allen, J. P. (2017). Perceptions of relatedness with classroom peers promote adolescents’ behavioral engagement and achievement in secondary school. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46 (11), 2341–2354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0724-2
Morin, A. J., Maïano, C., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., & Janosz, M. (2013). School life and adolescents’ self-esteem trajectories. Child Development, 84 (6), 1967–1988. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12089
Morrison, F. J., Connor, C. M., & Bachman, H. J. (2005). The transition to school. In Handbook of early literacy , Dickinson, D. K. and Neuman, S. B. Guilford. Vol. 2 National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). The condition of education 2003. : U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
National Research Council. (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn . National Academies Press.
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2003). Social functioning in first grade: Prediction from home, childcare and concurrent school experience. Child Development, 74 , 1639–1662. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-8624.2003.00629.x
Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7 (2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318
Norling, M., Sandberg, A., & Almqvist, L. (2015). Engagement and emergent literacy practices in Swedish preschools. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23 (5), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2014.996423
Pakarinen, E., Kiurua, N., Lerkkanenb, M. K., Poikkeusb, A. M., Ahonena, T., et al. (2011). Instructional support predicts children’s task avoidance in kindergarten. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26 , 376–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.11.003
Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Kaplan, A. (2007). Early adolescents’ perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99 , 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-06220.127.116.11
Pianta, R. C. (1999). Enhancing relationships between children and teachers . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. In M. B. Shinn & H. Yoshikawa (Eds.), Toward positive youth development: Transforming schools and community programs (pp. 21–40). Oxford University Press.
Pianta, R. B. (2006). Teacher–child relationships and early literacy. In D. K. Dickinson & S. B. Neuman (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 149–162). Guilford Press.
Pianta, R. C., & Allen, J. P. (2008). Building capacity for positive youth development in secondary school classrooms: Changing teachers’ interactions with students. In M. Shinn & H. Yoshikawa (Eds.), Toward positive youth development: Transforming schools and community programs (pp. 21–39). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195327892.003.0002
Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38 (2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09332374
Pianta, R. C., & Stuhlman, M. W. (2004). Teacher-child relationships and children’s success in the first years of school. School Psychology Review, 33 (3), 444–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2004.12086261
Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B., & Stuhlman, M. (2003). Relationships between teachers and children. In W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology, Vol. 7, pp. 199–234). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Pianta, R. C., La Paro, K. M., Payne, C., Cox, M., & Bradley, R. (2002). The relation of kindergarten class- room environment to teacher, family, and school characteristics and child outcomes. The Elementary School Journal, 102 (3), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1086/499701
Pianta, R. C., La Paro, K. M., & Hamre, B. K. (2004). Classroom assessment scoring system [CLASS] . Unpublished measure, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Pianta, R. C., Belsky, J., Houts, R., & Morrison, F. (2007). Opportunities to learn in America’s elementary classrooms. Science, 315 (5820), 1795–1796. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139719
Pianta, R. C., Belsky, J., Vandergrift, N., Houts, R., Morrison, F., & The NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2008a). Classroom effects on children’s achievement trajectories in elementary school. American Educational Research Journal, 45 (2), 365–397. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308230
Pianta, R. C., Mashburn, A. J., Downer, J. T., Hamre, B. K., & Justice, L. (2008b). Effects of web-mediated professional development resources on teacher–child interactions in pre-kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23 (4), 431–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.02.001
Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365–386). Springer.
Pöysä, S., Vasalampi, K., Muotka, J., Lerkkanen, M. K., Poikkeus, A. M., & Nurmi, J. E. (2019). Teacher–student interaction and lower secondary school students’ situational engagement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 89 (2), 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12244
Quin, D. (2017). Longitudinal and contextual associations between teacher–student relationships and student engagement: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 87 (2), 345–387. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316669434
Resnick, L. B., & Resnick, D. P. (1992). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tools for educational reform. In Changing assessments (pp. 37–75). Springer.
Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Early, D. M., & Cox, M. J. (2002). Early behavioral attributes and teachers’ sensitivity as predictors of competent behavior in the kindergarten classroom. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 23 (4), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(02)00128-4
Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., La Paro, K. M., Downer, J. T., & Pianta, R. C. (2005). The contribution of classroom setting and quality of instruction to children’s behavior in kindergarten classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 105 (4), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1086/429948
Roeser, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. J. (2000). School as a context of early adolescents’ academic and social-emotional development: A summary of research findings. The Elementary School Journal, 100 , 443–471. https://doi.org/10.1086/499650
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context . Oxford University Press.
Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81 (4), 493–529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793
Roorda, D. L., Jak, S., Zee, M., Oort, F. J., & Koomen, H. M. (2017). Affective teacher–student relationships and students’ engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic update and test of the mediating role of engagement. School Psychology Review, 46 (3), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0035.V46-3
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38 (2), 437–460. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038002437
Sabol, T. J., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). Patterns of school readiness forecast achievement and socioemotional development at the end of elementary school. Child Development, 83 (1), 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01678.x
Salmela-Aro, K. (2015). Toward a new science of academic engagement. Research in Human Development, 12 (3-4), 304–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2015.1068038
Schussler, D. L. (2009). Beyond content: How teachers manage classrooms to facilitate intellectual engagement for disengaged students. Theory Into Practice, 48 (2), 114–121.
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2014). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. In Applications of flow in human development and education (pp. 475–494). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840902776376
Siekkinen, M., Pakarinen, E., Lerkkanen, M. K., Poikkeus, A. M., Salminen, J., Poskiparta, E., & Nurmi, J. E. (2013). Social competence among 6-year-old children and classroom instructional support and teacher stress. Early Education & Development, 24 (6), 877–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2013.745183
Silver, R. B., Measelle, J., Essex, M., & Armstrong, J. M. (2005). Trajectories of externalizing behavior problems in the classroom: Contributions of child characteristics, family characteristics, and the teacher-child relationship during the school transition. Journal of School Psychology, 43 , 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2004.11.003
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2011). Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27 (6), 1029–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.001
Skinner, E. A. (2016). Engagement and disaffection as central to processes of motivational resilience development. In K. Wentzel & D. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed., pp. 145–168). Erlbaum.
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85 , 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0618.104.22.1681
Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). Springer.
Skinner, E. A., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Connell, J. P. (1998). Individual differences in the development of perceived control. In Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Serial No. 254, Vol. 63 . The University of Chicago Press.
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69 (3), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233
Soar, R., & Soar, R. (1979). Emotional climate and management. In P. Peterson & H. Walberg (Eds.), Research on teaching: Concepts, findings, and implications (pp. 97–119). McCutchan.
Spilt, J. L., Hughes, J. N., Wu, J. Y., & Kwok, O. M. (2012). Dynamics of teacher–student relationships: Stability and change across elementary school and the influence on children’s academic success. Child Development, 83 , 1180–1195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01761.x
Sullivan, A. L., & Bal, A. (2013). Disproportionality in special education: Effects of individual and school variables on disability risk. Exceptional Children, 79 (4), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291307900406
Valeski, T., & Stipek, D. (2001). Young children’s feelings about school. Child Development, 72 , 1198–1213. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00342
Veenman, M. V., Kok, R., & Blöte, A. W. (2005). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills in early adolescence. Instructional Science, 33 (3), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-004-2274-8
Verschueren, K., Doumen, S., & Buyse, E. (2012). Relationships with mother, teacher, and peers: Unique and joint effects on young children’s self-concept. Attachment & Human Development, 14 (3), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2012.672263
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes . Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1991). Genesis of the higher mental functions. In P. Light, S. Sheldon, & M. Woodhead (Eds.), Learning to think (pp. 32–41). Taylor & Frances/Routledge.
Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28 (2), 315–352. 10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1.
Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012a). Adolescent behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement trajectories in school and their differential relations to educational success. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22 (1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00753.x
Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012b). Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Development, 83 (3), 877–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01745.x
Wang, M. T., & Hofkens, T. L. (2019). Beyond classroom academics: A school-wide and multi-contextual perspective on student engagement in school. Adolescent Research Review, 1–15 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-019-00115-z
Wang, M. T., & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 47 (3), 633–662. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209361209
Wang, M. T., Chow, A., Hofkens, T., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2015). The trajectories of student emotional engagement and school burnout with academic and psychological development: Findings from Finnish adolescents. Learning and Instruction, 36 , 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.11.004
Wang, M. T., Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Hofkens, T. L., & Linn, J. S. (2016). The math and science engagement scales: Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties. Learning and Instruction, 43 , 16–26.
Wang, M. T., Fredricks, J., Ye, F., Hofkens, T., & Linn, J. S. (2017). Conceptualization and assessment of adolescents’ engagement and disengagement in school: A multidimensional school engagement scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35 (4), 592. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000431
Wang, M. T., Hofkens, T., & Ye, F. (2020). Classroom quality and adolescent student engagement and performance in mathematics: A multi-method and multi-informant approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49 (10), 1987–2002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01195-0
Wentzel, K. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90 (2), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0622.214.171.124
Wentzel, K. R. (2002). Are effective teachers like good parents? Teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence. Child Development, 73 (1), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00406
Wentzel, K. R. (2009). Students’ relationships with teachers as motivational contexts. In K. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation in school (pp. 301–322). Erlbaum.
Wentzel, K. R. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and adolescent competence at school. In Interpersonal relationships in education (pp. 17–36). Brill Sense.
Williams, W. M., Blythe, T., White, N., Li, J., Gardner, H., & Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Practical intelligence for school: Developing metacognitive sources of achievement in adolescence. Developmental Review, 22 (2), 162–210. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.2002.0544
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17 (2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Chipuer, H. M., Hanisch, M., Creed, P. A., & McGregor, L. (2006). Relationships at school and stage-environment fit as resources for adolescent engagement and achievement. Journal of Adolescence, 29 (6), 911–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.04.008
Authors and affiliations.
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
Tara L. Hofkens & Robert C. Pianta
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Tara L. Hofkens .
Editors and affiliations.
University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
Amy L. Reschly
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Sandra L. Christenson
Rights and permissions
Reprints and Permissions
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter.
Hofkens, T.L., Pianta, R.C. (2022). Teacher–Student Relationships, Engagement in School, and Student Outcomes. In: Reschly, A.L., Christenson, S.L. (eds) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07853-8_20
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07853-8_20
Published : 20 October 2022
Publisher Name : Springer, Cham
Print ISBN : 978-3-031-07852-1
Online ISBN : 978-3-031-07853-8
eBook Packages : Behavioral Science and Psychology Behavioral Science and Psychology (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Find a journal
- Publish with us
Home / Essay Samples / Sociology / Interpersonal Relationship / Teacher-Student Relationships
Teacher-student Relationships Essay Examples
The importance of establishing a positive relationship between teacher and student.
In these days, students and teachers’ relationship plays an important role in school and in the community. Teacher is the giver of information and students is the one who receive the gift of knowledge. Student love their teacher very much just like how they love...
Classroom Rules: Examining Their True Importance
Are classroom rules really important essay will explore the connection of the creation of rules and procedures to creating a positive classroom environment. It will discuss the manner in which certain rules and procedures can either promote or hinder a positive classroom environment, and examine...
Finding the Perfect Balance: Crafting My Conducive Learning Environment
It is a significant aspect of a teacher's duty to ensure a safe and supportive learning setting via various means to establish a conducive learning environment.When learners start the course, it is essential to set ground rules. Within this, it's necessary that the learners create...
The Role of Quality Education in Linking the Teacher and the Community
To analyze the link between the teacher and the community, this essay attempts to reveal the importance and role of teachers in the community and what role plays the quality of education on the community development. To start with the importance of teachers and the...
An Ideal Learning Community: Plc and Teacher Empowerment
Usually teachers are habituated to perform his or her duties individually within the work place. But in the last decade of twenty century this old approach turn into modern approach that is more effective for the teacher professional development through creating collaboration, sharing ideas and...
Learners and Learning: How to Become an Effective Teacher
Positive teacher-student relationships assist in a range of aspects in students' lives such as learning empathy, developing negotiation and harmonization skills. It further assists with instilling a higher level of self-confidence, self-esteem, critical thinking to develop trust and shows the role of effective teacher. This...
Why I Like My Teacher: a Reflection on Inspirational Education
Throughout my academic journey, I have been fortunate to encounter many teachers who have left a positive impact on my life. However, there is one particular teacher whom I admire and appreciate for various reasons. This essay aims to delve into the reasons why I...
What Sets Apart Great Teachers: Essential Qualities
The ability to be a good teacher comes from the identity and integrity of a person rather than a technique that they learn. In what makes a good teacher essay will be discussed the concept of being a good teacher. The concept of a good...
Unveiling Special Education: Understanding Its Essence
Studies conducted on the most appropriate way to care for early childhood children with special educational disabilities favor the inclusion of children with most categories of disability in the standard educational setting. In what is special education essay this topic will be considered. This approach...
The Factors of the Effective Teacher and Student Relationships
As a Christian educator, it is vital to determine what it means to teach Christianly before walking into the classroom. If we believe Jesus is Lord of all, then we know that he cannot be a part-time God. Likewise, we cannot be part-time Christians, just...
Trying to find an excellent essay sample but no results?
Don’t waste your time and get a professional writer to help!
You may also like
- Cultural Diversity
- Peer Pressure Essays
- Same Sex Marriage Essays
- Mentor Essays
- LGBT Essays
- Social Justice Essays
- Discourse Community Essays
- Weather Essays
- American Dream Essays
- Propaganda Essays
- Mass Hysteria Essays